Jump to
animations menu
Jump to
contents and animations menu
Return to top
The Simple Universe
In the Simple Universe model, electric charge is a consequnce of the direction of movement on the outer surface of a particle
This means, that in the model, all the particles are pieces of electric charge
The model achieves equal but opposite amounts of electric charge for the electron and the proton, by using a positron for the proton's internal positive electric charge
In the Simple Universe model, the particles of matter are torus shaped particles that are constructed using the model's elementary strand particle
The elementary strand particle is a particle that moves at a continuous single constant speed, against the model's static universal reference frame, in three dimensional space
The torus shaped electron has permanent internal movement in its sides that, depending on your direction of view, can be considered as either moving in the 'up' direction, or moving in the 'down' direction
And the torus shaped electron also has permanent internal movement in its circular torus that again, depending on your direction of view, can be considered as either moving in a 'clock-wise' direction, or moving in an 'anti-clockwise' direction
The positron has a similar structure to the electron, but the direction of the positron's permanent internal movement is different to the electron's permanent internal movement
The difference in the electron and positron's internal movement creates the concept of positive and negative electric charge in the model
In the model, when an electron and a positron have the same direction in their internal circular movements, then they have opposite directions in their internal side movements
And when an electron and a positron have the same direction in their internal side movements, then they have opposite directions in their internal circular movements
In the model, positive electric charge is defined as 'clock-wise' internal circular movement and 'down' side movement
Or if flipped 180 degrees, is defined as 'anticlock-wise' internal circular movement and 'up' side movement
And negative electric charge is defined as 'clock-wise' internal circular movement and 'up' side movement
Or if flipped 180 degrees, is defined as 'anticlock-wise' internal circular movement and 'down' side movement
The following animation shows a cutaway view of the shapes and structures of the model's subatomic particles, the the button toggles the slow mode on / off, with slow mode on, moving the mouse over the animation will slow roll the animation forward, button steps through the particles, the button start / stops the animation (any of the buttons can be used in pause mode)
The Subatomic Particles
Return to top
When they are stationary, the electron and the proton in the Simple Universe model, have an even distribution of electric charge in their structures
It is when the electron and the proton move, that their structures form an uneven distribution of electric charge, and the electron and the proton gain magnetic moments
In the Simple Universe model, the particles of matter are torus shaped particles that are constructed using the model's elementary strand particle
The elementary strand particle is a particle that moves at a continuous single constant speed, against the model's static universal reference frame, in three dimensional space
In the model, when an electron moves forward, the electron's internal strand particles that are moving in the forward direction, bunch up on that side of the electron
And the internal strand particles that are moving away from the forward direction, stretch out on that side of the electron
As a suggestion, this uneven spatial distribution of electric charge in a moving electron, gives a moving electron in the model a magnetic moment
As a suggestion, this is also true for a moving proton in the model
When a proton in the model moves forward, the proton's internal strand particles that are moving towards the forward direction, bunch up in that part of the proton
And the internal strand particles that are moving away from the forward direction, stretch out in that part of the proton
This produces an uneven spatial distribution of the positive and negative electric charges that are inside the two 'neutral' particles of the proton, and as a suggestion, this gives a moving proton in the model a magnetic moment
The following animation shows the even spatial distribution of electric charge in a stationary proton and a stationary electron in the Simple Universe model, the the button toggles the slow mode on / off, with slow mode on, moving the mouse over the animation will slow roll the animation forward, button start / stops the particles moving forwards, the button start / stops the animation (any of the buttons can be used in pause mode)
Moving The Matter Particles
The following animation shows the uneven spatial distribution of electric charge in a moving proton and a moving electron in the Simple Universe model, the the button toggles the slow mode on / off, with slow mode on, moving the mouse over the animation will slow roll the animation forward, button increases / stops the particles moving forwards, the button start / stops the animation (any of the buttons can be used in pause mode)
Moving The Matter Particles
For reference, here is a YouTube video (2021) that discusses the magnetic moment of the electron (from the YouTube channel Khan Academy)
Discussion of the magnetic moment of the electron
0 minutes : an electron in an atom is like a loop of electric current
1 minutes : atoms are like tiny magnets
3 minutes : calculating the magnetic dipole moment of this tiny atomic magnet
4 minutes : definition of electric current
10 minutes : the direction of the angular momentum
Return to top
The Simple Universe model has only one type of force-carrying particle, the model's electric field particle
This means that in the Simple Universe model, the model's electric field particles are required to be responsible for electric fields, magnetic fields, and gravitational fields
Put stuff in here
Return to top
The Simple Universe model has only one type of force-carrying particle, the model's electric field particle
This means that in the Simple Universe model, the model's electric field particles are required to be responsible for electric fields, magnetic fields, and gravitational fields
In the Simple Universe model, the particles of matter are torus shaped particles that are constructed using the model's elementary strand particle
The elementary strand particle is a particle that moves at a continuous single constant speed, against the model's static universal reference frame, in three dimensional space
In the model, the particles of matter emit their electric field particles in a periodic manner, via gaps that open and close on the surface of their torus rings
As a suggestion, when an electron in the model moves, the electron elongates its perfectly round torus shape
And emits its negative electric field particles in a more forward direction, rather than equally in all directions, as when it is stationary
As a suggestion, when a free electron travels down a wire, the free electron moves forwards in a circular loop that is aligned with the wire
Causing a higher proportion of negative electric field particles to emanate in a cone pattern that is aligned with the wire
And therefore, an unbalanced proportion of positive electric field particles in all of the other directions
The positive electric field particles come from the protons in the wire, which continue to emit their positive electric field particles equally in all directions
As a suggestion, some of the electrons in a magnet, move within the magnet in aligned parallel circular paths
This causes the magnet to show a negative electric field emanating parallel to the plane of the aligned circular paths, and a positive electric field in all of the other directions
As a suggestion, when an object that is overall neutral, has from each point within the object, a higher proportion of its negative electric field particles emitted parallel to a plane
Then the object has a magnetic field
For reference, here is a YouTube video (2020) that discusses how the path of a charged particle is affected when moving through a magnetic field (from the YouTube channel Khan Academy)
Discussion on the path of a charged particle moving through a magnetic field
0 minutes : the direction of the force when a charged particle moves perpendicular to a magnetic field
7 minutes : the direction of the force when the charged particle moves parallel to the magnetic field
8 minutes : the direction of the force when the charged particle moves at an angle to the magnetic field
11 minutes : the auroras at the poles of the earth
Return to top
The Simple Universe model has only one type of force-carrying particle, the model's electric field particle
This means that in the Simple Universe model, the model's electric field particles are required to be responsible for electric fields, magnetic fields, and gravitational fields
Put stuff in here
Return to top
Put stuff in here
For reference, here is a YouTube video (2024) of Dr. Angela Collier discussing quarks and chromodynamics (from the YouTube channel acollierastro)
Discussion on quantum chromodynamics
0 minutes : explain something simply
3 minutes : the strong force
5 minutes : gluons
6 minutes : colour charge
9 minutes : quantum mechanics
13 minutes : field theory
17 minutes : quarks and protons
19 minutes : Feynman diagrams
25 minutes : neutron decay
28 minutes : the weak force
29 minutes : quantum chromodynamics
Return to top
Put stuff in here
Put stuff in here
For reference, here is a YouTube video (2013) of Dr Bob Eagle discussing particle angular momentum and particle spin (from the YouTube channel DrPhysicsA)
Discussion on angular momentum and spin
0 minutes : introduction to angular momentum and spin
6 minutes : quantum angular momentum and quantum spin combined
8 minutes : the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and its commutative property
17 minutes : measuring quantum angular momentum
23 minutes : quantum angular momentum operator
38 minutes : quantum spin alignment states
Return to top
Put stuff in here
Put stuff in here
Put stuff in here
Put stuff in here
Put stuff in here
Put stuff in here
Return to top
Put stuff in here
Put stuff in here
Knowledge and understanding are similar to one another, but perhaps they are not always exactly the same as each other
For example, when asking why a weight falls to the ground, one could perhaps reply that the weight falls because the earth pulls on the weight
Such a reply answers what happens, which is knowledge, but only partially answers the why, for one could then ask why does the earth pull on the weight, and so on
It could be argued that it is not possible to ever fully answer a why question
However, I wonder if perhaps, like knowledge, for some why questions, it is possible to answer the why question completely
Return to top